PodcastsNewsTalkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other

Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other

Scan Media, LLC
Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other
Latest episode

423 episodes

  • Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other

    The Pledge | Repossession

    05/07/2026 | 12 mins.
    "Saying the pledge now isn't capitulation. It's repossession."

    Reviews are the lifeblood of independent podcasts. If TP&R belongs in more people's ears, here's how you make that happen:

    Apple Podcasts: Rate & Review on Apple

    Spotify: Rate on Spotify

    For 15 years, Corey stood during the Pledge of Allegiance without putting his hand on his heart or saying the words. It wasn't apathy, and it wasn't a performance. It was a conviction, rooted in Scripture and a genuine question: is this a pledge I can actually make? Then something shifted. In this solo episode, Corey traces the journey from that first awkward moment of awareness at a local business meeting, through the Book of Daniel, to a spring morning in 2026 — and explains why starting to say the pledge again isn't a concession to anyone. It's a reclamation.

    Calls to Action
    ✅ If this conversation resonates, consider sharing it with someone who believes connection across difference still matters.

    ✅ Subscribe to Corey’s Substack: coreysnathan.substack.com

    ✅ Leave a review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen: ratethispodcast.com/goodfaithpolitics

    ✅ Subscribe to Talkin’ Politics & Religion Without Killin’ Each Other on your favorite podcast platform.

    ✅ Watch the full conversation and subscribe on YouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligion

    Key Takeaways
    Ritual deserves examination. Standing and reciting from muscle memory is different from making a conscious pledge. The distinction matters.

    The flag and the republic are not the same thing. One can be weaponized; the other is the idea worth pledging to. Corey's return to the pledge came from finally separating the two.

    January 6th is not an abstraction. Men with the flag draped across their backs as a cape, the pole weaponized against police officers — those are photographs of specific people committing a specific desecration. That image clarified something.

    Reclamation, not capitulation. Words like conservative, Christian, liberty, and freedom have been sloganized and shouted as weapons. They belong to a tradition, not to the people who've hijacked them. Same goes for the pledge.

    The grammar of the pledge matters. Read without the unwritten, hypnotic pauses, the pledge isn't to a flag. It's to the republic for which the flag stands. That's a pledge worth making.

    Thanks to our Sponsors and Partners

    Thanks to Pew Research Center (pewresearch.org) for making today’s conversation possible.

    Proud members of The Democracy Group

    Connect on Social Media
    Corey is @coreysnathan on all the socials…

    Substack

    LinkedIn

    Facebook

    Instagram

    Twitter

    Threads

    Bluesky

    TikTok

    Go talk some politics and religion. With gentleness and respect.
  • Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other

    Caesar or Jackson? Jeffrey Rosen on the Constitution, the Founders, and What’s at Stake Today

    05/04/2026 | 1h 7 mins.
    “For Jefferson, Hamilton is not a hated enemy to be opposed or destroyed, but a respected adversary to be debated with. And that is the spirit we have to get back to today.” — Jeffrey Rosen

    Jeffrey Rosen is one of the most respected constitutional scholars in America — CEO Emeritus of the National Constitution Center, professor of law at George Washington University Law School, contributing editor at The Atlantic, and the author of nine books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Pursuit of Happiness and The Pursuit of Liberty. In this conversation, Rosen traces the Hamilton–Jefferson rivalry from the founding era to the Roberts Court, asks whether the current administration looks more like Caesar or Andrew Jackson, makes the case that deep reading may be the last best hope for democracy, and previews his forthcoming biography of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It is the kind of conversation that reminds you what civic discourse, at its best, can actually look like.

    Calls to Action
    ✅ If this conversation resonates, consider sharing it with someone who believes connection across difference still matters.

    ✅ Subscribe to Corey’s Substack: coreysnathan.substack.com

    ✅ Leave a review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen: ratethispodcast.com/goodfaithpolitics

    ✅ Subscribe to Talkin’ Politics & Religion Without Killin’ Each Other on your favorite podcast platform.

    ✅ Watch the full conversation and subscribe on YouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligion

    Key Takeaways

    Caesar or Jackson? Rosen frames the central question about the current administration: is this a Caesar who subverts the separation of powers and rules by whim rather than law, or a Jackson-style populist who attacks elites and large institutions but ultimately operates within the constitutional system? The distinction, Rosen argues, matters enormously.

    The Hamilton–Jefferson divide is still very much alive. The debate between liberal and strict construction of the Constitution did not begin with originalism. It began with the bank. Hamilton argued Congress could imply powers beyond what’s enumerated; Jefferson said no. John Marshall sided with Hamilton, and that fault line runs directly through today’s Supreme Court.

    The pursuit of happiness meant something very different to the Founders. For Jefferson, Madison, and their classical sources, happiness was not about feeling good. It was about being good — cultivating temperance, prudence, courage, and justice, and using reason to moderate unproductive emotions like anger, envy, and fear.

    Social media is Madison’s nightmare. Madison designed a system of deliberative slowness. Social media’s “enraged to engage” business model is the precise opposite. Rosen adds that AI compounds the problem by presenting a single probabilistic version of truth rather than fostering the clash of competing ideas that the Enlightenment depended on.

    Brandeis offers a way out of the left–right impasse. Suspicious of both big government and big business, and committed to industrial democracy and worker ownership, Louis Brandeis remains the historical figure who most persuasively bridges the divide between libertarians and progressives.

    Opposed in life as in death. Hamilton and Jefferson spent careers savaging each other. Yet after Hamilton’s death, Jefferson placed a bust of Hamilton across from his own at Monticello. That image — honored adversaries, not enemies — is the model Rosen believes the country desperately needs to recover.

    About Our Guest
    Jeffrey Rosen is President and CEO Emeritus of the National Constitution Center, a professor of law at George Washington University Law School, and a contributing editor at The Atlantic. He is the author of nine books, including The Pursuit of Happiness, The Pursuit of Liberty, and Louis D. Brandeis: American Prophet. His essays and commentary have appeared in The New Yorker, The New York Times Magazine, The New Republic, and on NPR. He also served as an advisor for Ken Burns’ The American Revolution on PBS. His forthcoming biography of Ruth Bader Ginsburg is part of the Yale Jewish Lives series.

    Links and Resources

    National Constitution Center - constitutioncenter.org

    GW Law - www.law.gwu.edu

    Jeffrey Rosen on X - @RosenJeffrey

    Connect on Social Media
    Corey is @coreysnathan on all the socials…

    Substack

    LinkedIn

    Facebook

    Instagram

    Twitter

    Threads

    Bluesky

    TikTok

    Thanks to our Sponsors and Partners

    Thanks to Pew Research Center (pewresearch.org) for making today’s conversation possible.

    Proud members of The Democracy Group

    Now go talk some politics and religion — with gentleness and respect.
  • Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other

    Will the Midterms Even Matter? | Corey Nathan with Michael Baranowski on The Politics Guys

    05/01/2026 | 56 mins.
    Most of us are going to be disappointed. The question is whether that disappointment has to mean paralysis.

    Corey Nathan recently joined Michael Baranowski on The Politics Guys for a conversation that refuses to offer easy comfort or easy despair. The 2026 midterms are the jumping-off point: what's likely, what's actually at stake, and whether a Democratic wave would change much of anything. But the conversation goes deeper than the electoral map. Structural incentives, uncompetitive districts, the filibuster, the parliamentary rulebook, and the question of where, if anywhere, the green shoots of real democratic renewal are actually growing. This feed drop brings that conversation to the TP&R audience.

    Calls to Action
    ✅ If this conversation resonates, consider sharing it with someone who believes connection across difference still matters.

    ✅ Subscribe to Corey’s Substack: coreysnathan.substack.com

    ✅ Leave a review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen: ratethispodcast.com/goodfaithpolitics

    ✅ Subscribe to Talkin’ Politics & Religion Without Killin’ Each Other on your favorite podcast platform.

    ✅ Watch the full conversation and subscribe on YouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligion

    Key Takeaways

    The wave may come, but the players mostly stay the same. Structural analysis of the 2026 midterms suggests Democrats have a strong shot at the House and an outside chance at the Senate. But more than 90% of incumbents survive any given cycle, so even a wave election doesn't reset the cast of characters or their incentives.

    Investigations matter, but so does whether Congress actually does its job. A Democratic House would have subpoena power and majority-staffed committees. The more important question is whether that translates into substantive accountability or just performance.

    Competitive elections have made compromise harder, not easier. When one party holds power for decades at a stretch, half a loaf looks good. When every election is winnable, the incentive shifts to demonization and the next cycle. The hyper-competitive era since 1994 has structural roots that don't vanish with a change in majority.

    The green shoots are at the state and local level. Cross-partisan collaboration is visible in places like Santa Clarita, where a Republican city council member and a Democratic congressman are working together on local infrastructure. Organizations like Future Caucus are documenting exactly this kind of millennial and Gen Z cross-partisan energy.

    One conversation at a time is not a consolation prize. Incremental, constitutionally grounded change is not a failure of ambition. It is, as Corey puts it, what the founders actually promised future generations. The broccoli booth in the candy store still matters.

    About Michael Baranowski and The Politics Guys
    Michael Baranowski is a political scientist and the host of The Politics Guys, a podcast committed to honest, nonpartisan political analysis. He brings an institutionalist's eye to American politics and a refreshing willingness to follow the evidence wherever it leads, including to conclusions neither side particularly wants to hear.

    Links and Resources

    The Politics Guys - politicsguys.com

    The Context Podcast - kettering.org/thecontext

    Connect on Social Media
    Corey is @coreysnathan on all the socials…

    Substack

    LinkedIn

    Facebook

    Instagram

    Twitter

    Threads

    Bluesky

    TikTok

    Thanks to our Sponsors and Partners

    Thanks to Pew Research Center (pewresearch.org) for making today’s conversation possible.

    Proud members of The Democracy Group

    Democracy is not a spectator sport.
  • Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other

    A WEAVE Conversation | Jaime Encinas on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), Breaking Cycles, and Wheeling to Healing

    04/26/2026 | 58 mins.
    He held a knife to his father's throat and felt, in that same moment, something he could only call love. That paradox — and the lifelong journey it set in motion — is what this conversation is about.

    Jaime Encinas is an entrepreneur, author, and spiritual leader whose life has been shaped by trauma, healing, and the hard work of breaking cycles. Founder of Wheeling to Healing and a fellow with WEAVE: The Social Fabric Project, Jaime brings a rare combination of personal testimony and practical framework to the question of how we repair — ourselves, our families, and our communities. In this conversation, we explore Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), the science of trauma, the meaning of forgiveness, and why the most powerful thing we can offer another person is simply to see them.

    Calls to Action
    ✅ If this conversation resonates, consider sharing it with someone who believes connection across difference still matters.

    ✅ Subscribe to Corey’s Substack: coreysnathan.substack.com

    ✅ Leave a review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen: ratethispodcast.com/goodfaithpolitics

    ✅ Subscribe to Talkin’ Politics & Religion Without Killin’ Each Other on your favorite podcast platform.

    ✅ Watch the full conversation and subscribe on YouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligion

    Key Takeaways

    From "what's wrong with you" to "what happened to you." The ACEs framework — developed through research on adverse childhood experiences — reframes dysfunction not as a character flaw but as a response to trauma. That shift in question changes everything about how we approach healing.

    Cycles of violence are made to be broken. Jaime traces his father's cruelty to his grandfather's — and to the deeper legacy of colonization. Understanding the origin of pain doesn't excuse it. But it opens the door to compassion, and ultimately to forgiveness.

    Presence is a practice. From Meisner technique to contemplative prayer, Jaime has spent a lifetime learning to be still — and argues that our capacity to truly see one another depends on it.

    "See me" is the deepest human ask. Whether it's a child to a parent, a neighbor to a stranger, or a person experiencing homelessness to a passerby — the need to be truly seen cuts across every divide we face.

    Heaven might be here. Jaime's theology is grounded and immediate: the sacred shows up in moments of genuine encounter — washing a father's feet, walking beside a daughter in recovery, hugging someone on the street.

    About Our Guest
    Jaime Encinas is the founder of Wheeling to Healing, an organization dedicated to educating communities about the science of trauma and offering practical pathways toward healing. He is the author of two books drawn from that work and has spent decades as an educator, activist, and spiritual leader working with vulnerable communities. Jaime is a fellow with WEAVE: The Social Fabric Project, an Aspen Institute initiative that supports local leaders working to repair social trust.

    Links and Resources

    Wheeling to Healing - www.amazon.com/Wheeling-Healing-Broken-Heart-Bicycle/dp/194605402X

    Take the ACEs Quiz - www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/03/02/387007941/take-the-ace-quiz-and-learn-what-it-does-and-doesnt-mean

    WEAVE: The Social Fabric Project - weavers.org

    Connect on Social Media
    Corey is @coreysnathan on all the socials…

    Substack

    LinkedIn

    Facebook

    Instagram

    Twitter

    Threads

    Bluesky

    TikTok

    Thanks to our Sponsors and Partners

    Thanks to Pew Research Center (pewresearch.org) for making today’s conversation possible.

    Proud members of The Democracy Group

    Go talk some politics and religion — with gentleness and respect.
  • Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other

    The GFY Vote: Trumpism, Progressive Overreach, and the Democracy We Say We Care About

    04/24/2026 | 22 mins.
    For a significant plurality of those who voted for Donald Trump in 2024, it all really comes down to one thing. Owning the Libs. So what price is anyone willing to pay for that?

    The question "at what cost" doesn't belong to one side of the aisle. In this solo episode of TP&R Uninterrupted, Corey Nathan turns the lens on both Trump loyalists and progressive purists, arguing that the price of performative politics is being paid by everyone. Drawing on the More in Common "Beyond MAGA" study, real conversations with friends and family who took the GFY vote in 2024, and the electoral evidence from Virginia and New Jersey, Corey makes the case that civic renewal requires something harder than winning arguments: it requires welcoming people back in without making them confess their sins first.

    Calls to Action
    ✅ If this conversation resonates, consider sharing it with someone who believes connection across difference still matters.

    ✅ Subscribe to Corey’s Substack: coreysnathan.substack.com

    ✅ Leave a review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen: ratethispodcast.com/goodfaithpolitics

    ✅ Subscribe to Talkin’ Politics & Religion Without Killin’ Each Other on your favorite podcast platform.

    ✅ Watch the full conversation and subscribe on YouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligion

    Key Takeaways
    The GFY vote is real, it's personal, and it's persuadable. Corey traces how years of condescension, finger-wagging, and political shaming drove thoughtful people — including his own son and a close Latino friend — not toward Trump's policies, but toward a defiant rejection of the people lecturing them. Understanding that pathway is the first step toward reversing it.

    The math makes the reluctant right the ball game. The More in Common "Beyond MAGA" study identifies the Reluctant Right as roughly 20% of Trump's 2024 coalition — more than 15 million voters. In a country where House districts are decided by 333 votes, that's not a rounding error. It's the margin.

    Progressive overreach has a price tag too. The same "at what cost" question Corey puts to Trump loyalists applies to the activist left. Performative purity tests, canceling the insufficiently orthodox, and demanding ideological confession before welcoming people into the coalition aren't just annoying — they're losing strategies with receipts.

    Loyalty to Trump has an itemized bill. From Pam Bondi's congressional hearing burn book to Marco Rubio's Oval Office silence while Zelensky was demeaned, Corey walks through the specific transactions made by people who had everything to lose. These aren't rhetorical questions. They're the same question, applied to people who answered it in public.

    The Buckley model points the way forward. What the pro-democracy coalition needs to do is what William F. Buckley did with the Birchers: marginalize the voices making the coalition unelectable, and when someone from the reluctant right shows up at the party, say come on in, the water's warm.

    Links and Resources

    More in Common — Beyond MAGA: Understanding the Full Spectrum of Trump Voters

    Hidden Tribes Study — More in Common: Hidden Tribes of America

    Connect on Social Media
    Corey is @coreysnathan on all the socials…

    Substack

    LinkedIn

    Facebook

    Instagram

    Twitter

    Threads

    Bluesky

    TikTok

    Thanks to our Sponsors and Partners

    Thanks to Pew Research Center (pewresearch.org) for making today’s conversation possible.

    Proud members of The Democracy Group

    Honest conversation across difference is harder than it looks. It's also the only thing that works.

More News podcasts

About Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other

Politics and Religion. We’re not supposed to talk about that, right? Wrong! We only say that nowadays because the loudest, most extreme voices have taken over the whole conversation. Well, we‘re taking some of that space back! If you’re dying for some dialogue instead of all the yelling; if you know it’s okay to have differences without having to hate each other; if you believe politics and religion are too important to let ”the screamers” drown out the rest of us and would love some engaging, provocative and fun conversations about this stuff, then ”Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other” is for you!
Podcast website

Listen to Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other, NPR News Now and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features

Talkin‘ Politics & Religion Without Killin‘ Each Other: Podcasts in Family

Social
v8.8.16| © 2007-2026 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 5/11/2026 - 12:51:06 PM