The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

1. Politicization of the Super Bowl Halftime Show
The halftime show is no longer neutral entertainment but a platform for left-wing political messaging.
Bad Bunny’s selection is framed as intentional ideological signaling rather than artistic choice.
Many viewers allegedly opted out and watched an alternative, America-focused broadcast instead.
2. Criticism of Bad Bunny’s Political Activism
Bad Bunny is openly hostile to U.S. immigration enforcement (ICE), Donald Trump, and conservative politics.
His past statements and performances are cited as evidence of anti-American sentiment, including: Anti-ICE speeches at award shows
Support for Black Lives Matter protests, including justification of unrest
Use of explicit anti-Trump language

His refusal to tour in the U.S. and insistence on performing only in Spanish are framed as ideological acts.
3. Cultural Division and Language Controversy
Performing exclusively in Spanish is characterized as a deliberate rejection of American norms.
Critics argue this alienated large portions of the Super Bowl audience.
Supporters within the discussion downplay the issue, suggesting cultural exposure is harmless.
4. NFL’s Role and Motivation
The NFL is accused of “selling out” American audiences to expand global and non-U.S. markets.
League leadership defends the decision as inclusive and unifying, which the commentary strongly disputes.
The NFL is portrayed as indifferent to political backlash as long as viewership grows.
5. Reaction from Donald Trump and Conservatives
Donald Trump’s reaction is heavily featured, condemning the halftime show as: One of the worst ever
Inappropriate for families
Disrespectful to American values

Conservative commentators echo these criticisms but differ on how much outrage is warranted.
6. Broader Commentary on Celebrity Politics
Several speakers express fatigue with celebrities using entertainment platforms to push political views.
While disliking Bad Bunny’s politics, some argue that outrage over halftime shows is overblown.
7. Shift to California Tax Policy
Example: An NFL player (Sam Darnold) allegedly owed more in California taxes than he earned in game bonuses.
California is portrayed as economically hostile to high earners, encouraging talent to leave the state.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Super Bowl & Cultural Commentary
The discussion opens with dismissive reactions to the Super Bowl halftime show, particularly focusing on Bad Bunny.
The Celebrity political signaling is a cultural backlash as exaggerated or performative.
Cultural change is being pushed by elites rather than organically embraced.
2. California Tax Policy Critique
California’s tax system punishes high earners and visiting performers, especially athletes.
Example cited: NFL player bonuses allegedly being taxed at levels exceeding the bonus itself due to “duty day” rules.
California is economically self-destructive, encouraging talent and businesses to leave the state.
Texas and other low-tax states are contrasted as more economically rational alternatives.
3. “Follow the Money” – DEI & Philanthropy
Mellon funding is: Promoting DEI-focused hiring
Encouraging identity-based academic disciplines
Influencing faculty pipelines from undergraduate fellowships through tenure-track positions

This funding results in racial discrimination, ideological conformity, and activist scholarship, rather than academic merit.
4. Transformation of Higher Education
Universities are depicted as having shifted from traditional scholarship toward activist-driven ideologies.
Fields like military history or classical studies are framed as marginalized, while intersectional or abolitionist studies are favored.
Philanthropic foundations are blamed for reshaping academia without democratic accountability.
5. Political Activism & Protest Funding
Anti-ICE protests are described as organized, rehearsed, and financially backed, not grassroots.
Protesters allegedly admit to being paid, reinforcing the claim that activism is professionally funded.
This is framed as evidence of manufactured dissent and coordinated political agitation.
6. Virginia Governance & Immigration Policy
Virginia’s Democratic leadership is accused of: Cutting cooperation with ICE
Releasing criminal undocumented immigrants
Advancing aggressive redistricting reforms

These actions are framed as an “assault on democracy” and a warning sign ahead of future elections.
There is no longer a meaningful distinction between moderate and radical Democrats.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Large-Scale Individual Fraud Example
A Los Angeles contractor, Alexander Suker, is accused of stealing $23 million intended to feed and house homeless individuals.
Funds were allegedly used for luxury homes, cars, vacations, designer goods, and private schools, instead of homeless services.
2. Failure to Deliver Promised Services
Suker was contracted to provide three meals per day to up to 600 homeless people.
Inspections reportedly found only canned beans and ramen noodles, contradicting billing claims.
Prosecutors allege the use of fake vendors, falsified facilities, and false service records.
3. Broader Pattern of Fraud in California
Federal authorities indicate at least 12 additional similar cases under investigation.
A U.S. Attorney stated that large sums were pushed out quickly with minimal vetting or checks and balances.
4. Comparison to Other State Scandals
Investigators and commentators compare California’s situation to Minnesota’s Feeding Our Future fraud, claiming California’s fraud may be larger in scale.
Independent investigator Nick Shirley claims billions of dollars may be involved statewide.
5. Alleged Billions in Unaccounted Public Funds
$70 billion in taxpayer funds missing or unaccounted for
$24 billion spent on allegedly nonexistent homelessness programs
$18 billion on nonfunctional high-speed rail
$32 billion in stolen COVID relief funds
$2.5 billion lost to SNAP fraud
6. Political and Structural Implications
California leadership is accused of enabling fraud by prioritizing rapid spending over accountability.
Calls are made for whistleblower lawsuits as a tool to recover funds.
Critics argue that higher taxes are being proposed despite massive losses.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. United Nations Funding Crisis
The United Nations is facing financial collapse because the United States has reduced or withdrawn funding.
This is a move to stop funding “woke” & ideological programs.
The UN is ineffective, bureaucratic, and overly dependent on U.S. taxpayer money.
Symbolic examples (turned-off escalators, reduced heating) are used to emphasize desperation and mismanagement.
The U.S. withdrew from 66 international organizations and treaties, framed as: Cost-saving
Anti-globalist
Pro-American sovereignty

Many of these organizations are described as obscure, wasteful, or hostile to U.S. interests.
The underlying message is that global institutions dilute U.S. power without delivering value.
2. Media Merger and National Security Concerns
Focus shifts to a major media merger (Netflix / Warner Bros / Paramount context).
Concerns raised include: Foreign influence, especially money from the Middle East or China
National security implications
Loss of American cultural control

The argument is that entertainment media shapes public perception more than news.
Hollywood and major streaming platforms are portrayed as: Predominantly left-wing
Hostile to conservative viewpoints
Engaged in ideological indoctrination

Executives are challenged on whether their content fairly represents conservatives.
The inability to name conservative-oriented programming is used as evidence of bias.
The merger is framed as dangerous because it could: Concentrate cultural and political influence
Amplify a single ideological viewpoint

The Department of Justice and FCC are identified as key gatekeepers.
The timeline for approval is described as months to years, with high stakes for media freedom.
3. Save America Act (Voter ID Legislation)
Proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote
Photo ID to vote

The bill is common-sense and widely supported, including among minority voters.
Democrats, particularly Chuck Schumer, are accused of: Using “Jim Crow” rhetoric to scare voters
Ignoring polling that shows broad support for voter ID

Opposition is attributed to: Desire to preserve election vulnerabilities
Partisan strategy rather than public opinion

Ballot harvesting is described as inherently vulnerable to abuse.
Examples (nursing homes, paid operatives) are used to argue: Elderly and vulnerable voters can be exploited
Ballots can be selectively discarded

The Carter–Baker Commission is cited to legitimize these concerns.
Acknowledges internal Republican resistance and logistical challenges.
Emphasizes urgency and political pressure as tools to pass the bill.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Launch of TrumpRx.gov
The White House announced and launched TrumpRx.gov, a federal website designed to provide Americans access to significantly discounted prescription drugs.
The platform allows patients with valid prescriptions to obtain savings via manufacturer-supported coupons, downloadable or printable, integrated through the website.
2. Most Favored Nation (MFN) Drug Pricing Model
The initiative is based on Most Favored Nation pricing, meaning U.S. patients pay prices comparable to the lowest prices paid by other developed nations.
The document argues Americans have historically overpaid due to pharmaceutical lobbying and systemic corruption, which MFN pricing aims to correct.
3. Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Participation
Initial participating manufacturers include: AstraZeneca
Eli Lilly
Novo Nordisk
Pfizer

Additional drugs and manufacturers are expected to be added over time as more MFN pricing agreements are finalized.
4. Major Drug Price Reductions (Examples)
The document highlights dramatic price cuts on high‑cost, high‑usage medications:
Diabetes & Weight‑Loss Drugs Ozempic‑type injectables: ~$1,000+ → as low as $199/month
Wegovy: ~$1,349 → as low as $149
Zepbound: ~$1,088 → as low as $299–$346

Insulin Available for as low as $25/month

Respiratory Medications COPD inhalers: ~$500 → $51
Asthma inhalers: ~$504 → $201

Menopause/Osteoporosis Drug Duavee: ~$202 → $30

These examples are presented as evidence of the “largest prescription drug price reduction in U.S. history.”
5. Fertility Drug Cost Relief
Fertility medications are emphasized as a major priority due to high out‑of‑pocket costs.
Families may save over $2,000 per IVF cycle on average.
Example reductions include: One fertility drug reduced to $168 per pen
Another reduced to $22–$50

Personal testimony is used to highlight the financial burden of infertility treatments.
6. Policy and Legislative Timeline
Key policy milestones cited in the document:
May 12, 2025 – Executive Order signed: Delivering Most Favored Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients
July 31, 2025 – Letters sent to major drug manufacturers outlining required price reductions
Since September 2025 – 16 MFN pricing deals announced with pharmaceutical companies
December 1, 2025 – Agreement with the UK to raise its drug prices by 25%, shifting more costs overseas
January 15, 2026 – Call for Congress to pass the “Great Healthcare Plan” to codify savings and increase transparency
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.