The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

Federal Crackdown on Medicaid Fraud
CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz, working under President Donald Trump’s administration, has initiated a nationwide effort to combat Medicaid fraud, citing billions of dollars in losses due to noncompliant and fraudulent providers.

All 50 Governors Put on Notice
Every U.S. governor—regardless of party—has received identical letters requiring immediate action, signaling that Medicaid fraud is viewed as a national, not partisan, problem.

Strict Deadlines Imposed
10 business days: Governors must confirm whether they will conduct rapid revalidation of high‑risk Medicaid providers.
30 days: States must submit a broader Medicaid provider revalidation strategy.
Two‑year plan: States must outline long‑term methods for verifying provider legitimacy and compliance.

Focus on High‑Risk Providers CMS is prioritizing providers with:
Weak enrollment standards
Less rigorous billing oversight
Missing or invalid National Provider Identifiers (NPIs)
These providers are considered most vulnerable to fraud, waste, and abuse.

Escalated Federal Oversight Failure to comply with revalidation requirements will be used as a risk indicator of fraud and could affect future federal Medicaid funding decisions.

Law Enforcement Coordination States are instructed to work closely with law enforcement agencies, indicating that criminal investigations and prosecutions are expected to increase.

Catalyst: High‑Profile Fraud Cases Major scandals—especially in Minnesota and California—have intensified scrutiny:
Minnesota’s “Feeding Our Future” case (~$250M)
A state review estimating up to $1.7B in improper payments over four years These cases highlighted systemic vulnerabilities.

Potential Funding Deferrals CMS is considering Medicaid payment deferrals in states deemed noncompliant, setting the stage for legal and political conflicts between state and federal governments.

Policy Framed as Taxpayer Protection The initiative is presented as safeguarding resources for intended beneficiaries—low‑income individuals, seniors, children, and people with disabilities—by removing corrupt actors from the system.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center
The Southern Poverty Law Center: Was criminally indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Funded or financially supported extremist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazi organizations, and organizers of the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally.
Engaged in wire fraud, money laundering, and donor deception.

The SPLC is operating a fraudulent fundraising model, allegedly exaggerating or manufacturing extremism to increase donations.
The SPLC funding of extremists is: Intentional
Long‑term
Central to its fundraising success

Corporate donors (Apple, JPMorgan, MGM, etc.) are cited as unwitting enablers, accused of donating for “virtue signaling.”
2. Media and Institutional Complicity
Mainstream media ignored or covered up SPLC wrongdoing.
Corporate America gave millions without oversight.
Political and cultural elites protected SPLC due to ideological alignment.

Past warnings from commentators (e.g., John Stossel) are cited as evidence that concerns were longstanding.
3. Political Impact
The Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville is described as: Financially linked to SPLC funding, according to the show’s claims.
Used politically to attack conservatives and Donald Trump.

The SPLC allegedly used extremist events to drive massive fundraising growth, citing revenue increases after major controversies.
4. Free Speech and Campus Controversies
A UCLA Law School event where progressive students allegedly disrupted and silenced a conservative speaker from the Department of Homeland Security.

The behavior is a “heckler’s veto”, framed as: Antithetical to free speech
A sign of ideological intolerance on the left

Comparisons are made to similar incidents at Stanford Law School.
Law students are criticized as being unfit for the legal profession if they engage in such conduct.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Large-Scale Spending Allegation
Claims California spent approximately $1 billion to bring or support 400,000 undocumented immigrants.
Attributes these figures to a report allegedly from the Manhattan Institute.

Use of Public Funds
Asserts state and federal tax dollars were directed to nonprofit organizations (e.g., Catholic Charities, Jewish Family Services, immigrant legal groups).
Frames this funding as political kickbacks rather than humanitarian or service-based grants.

Political Organizing Accusations
Claims immigrant-advocacy organizations function as political machines: Organizing protests
Producing political messaging
Monitoring ICE activities

Alleges coordination with Democratic political goals.

Social and Economic Impact Narrative
Argues mass immigration: Depresses wages
Increases housing costs
Strains public services
Drives longtime residents out of California

Uses anecdotal housing examples to emphasize overcrowding and rent inflation.

Historical and Ideological Framing
Compares modern Democratic immigration policies to 19th-century political machines (e.g., Tammany Hall).
Frames migrants as: Economic tools
Long-term welfare recipients
Future Democratic voters

Uses language suggesting exploitation and dependency.

Criticism of Sanctuary Policies
Strongly opposes sanctuary city laws.
Frames limits on immigration enforcement as: Encouraging illegality
Undermining public safety
Blocking federal authority


Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Alleged DOJ Indictment
The text claims the SPLC was indicted by an Alabama grand jury on 11 felony counts, including: Wire fraud
False statements to a federally insured bank
Conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering

2. Alleged Long‑Term Fraud Scheme
SPLC is accused of running a decades‑long fraudulent operation (dating back to the 1980s).
The alleged scheme involved raising donor funds to “fight” extremist groups while secretly funding them.
3. Alleged Funding of Extremist Groups
The document asserts SPLC funneled over $3 million (2014–2023) to individuals tied to extremist organizations, including: Ku Klux Klan
Aryan Nations
National Socialist Movement
United Clans of America
National Alliance
American Front

Funds were allegedly used to support leadership and facilitate crimes.
4. Use of Shell Companies and Money Laundering
SPLC allegedly: Created fake organizations (shell entities) with no real operations
Moved money through multiple accounts
Loaded funds onto prepaid cards to obscure the money trail

This is framed as the basis for money‑laundering charges.
5. Alleged Role in Charlottesville “Unite the Right” Rally
A claimed SPLC source is alleged to have: Been part of online leadership chats planning the 2017 Charlottesville rally
Helped coordinate logistics while under SPLC supervision

6. Statements Attributed to Officials
Claims are attributed to: Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche
FBI Director Kash Patel

Both are portrayed as asserting that SPLC: Lied to its donors
Enriched itself
Actively fueled extremist activity rather than dismantling it

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Purpose of the Book
The book aims to: Tell Clarence Thomas’s personal life story, especially his rise from extreme poverty.
Explain his judicial philosophy and jurisprudence in plain, accessible language.

It is based on approximately 9.5 hours of exclusive, one‑on‑one interviews between Ted Cruz and Justice Thomas.
Cruz emphasizes that the book is written for non‑lawyers, including students and general readers.
2. Clarence Thomas’s Background and Life Journey
Grew up in severe poverty in Pin Point, Georgia, raised primarily by his grandfather.
Initially spoke a Gullah/Geechee dialect, not English.
Experienced racism, hardship, family conflict, and personal struggles, including anger and a period of heavy drinking.
Attended seminary with the intention of becoming a Catholic priest, later leaving due to disillusionment.
Educated at Holy Cross College and Yale Law School.
Underwent a major ideological transformation, moving from left‑wing Black Power activism to conservative principles over many years.
3. Professional Rise and Historic Achievements
Faced career obstacles due to perceptions surrounding affirmative action.
Worked under Republican Senator John Danforth, which became a turning point.
Served in: The Reagan administration
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals

Appointed in 1991 as the second Black Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.
On track to become the longest‑serving Supreme Court justice in U.S. history (by 2028).
4. Judicial Philosophy (“Going Further”)
Thomas’s jurisprudence emphasizes: Originalism and the original meaning of the Constitution
The belief that rights come from God/nature, not government
A color‑blind Constitution
Judicial restraint: judges should interpret and apply law, not create policy

His opinions are intentionally plain‑spoken and accessible, reflecting his background and respect for ordinary citizens.
The title Going Further reflects his tendency to push legal reasoning to its foundational principles rather than incremental change.
5. Confirmation Hearings and Public Attacks
The book examines the 1991 confirmation hearings, including: Allegations by Anita Hill
Intense political and media attacks

Cruz draws parallels between Thomas’s hearings and later Supreme Court confirmations (e.g., Brett Kavanaugh).
Thomas is portrayed as enduring racialized hostility and vilification because of his conservative views.
6. Legacy and Moral Example
Clarence Thomas is presented as: A model of personal resilience, discipline, and principle
Someone who maintained convictions despite decades of criticism

Cruz argues Thomas would be widely celebrated if he were liberal, but instead has been marginalized.
The book frames Thomas as a role model for principled living, not just for lawyers but for all Americans.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.