The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

1. Claimed Greenland/Arctic Framework Deal
President Trump announced a framework for a future agreement involving Greenland and the broader Arctic region, reached through discussions with NATO leadership and U.S. allies.
This is not a military action or invasion, but a diplomatic and security-oriented arrangement still under development.
The deal is framed as long‑term (“forever”), contrasting it with past time‑limited international agreements.
2. Focus on Arctic Security and Strategic Competition
The core justification presented is national and allied security, particularly limiting Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic.
China’s has a stated interest in Arctic dominance and the deal is preemptive containment.
Greenland is described as strategically important due to geography, security positioning, and mineral resources.
3. Denial of Military Intent
A central theme is the explicit rejection of military force as a means of acquiring Greenland.
Claims of potential invasion were misinformation spread by media and political opponents.
Trump is quoted as saying military action would not be necessary.
4. Use of Economic Leverage (Tariffs)
Trump used tariff threats against European allies as negotiating leverage.
The subsequent removal of tariff threats is evidence that diplomacy succeeded.
This approach is intentional pressure rather than economic aggression.
5. Rejection of Media and Democratic Narratives
Predicting war or invasion
Mischaracterizing Trump’s intentions
Ignoring diplomatic outcomes

6. Introduction of a “Board of Peace” Concept
Separate from Greenland, the document introduces Trump’s idea to create a “Board of Peace”.
This proposed body is an alternative or supplement to the United Nations, which is ineffective.
7. Critique of the United Nations
The UN has had historical failures in: Rwanda
Syria
China’s treatment of Uyghurs
Iran’s protest crackdowns
Myanmar
Sudan

Veto power and authoritarian influence render the UN ineffective.
We need a new peace mechanism under U.S. leadership.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Portrayal of ICE Operations
ICE arrests in Minnesota (Minneapolis/St. Paul) are presented as targeting violent criminal offenders, including: Registered sex offenders
Individuals accused of rape
Individuals with histories of domestic violence, DUI, and sexual assault

These individuals were previously free due to local non‑cooperation with ICE.
ICE is described as fulfilling its intended mission of removing dangerous criminals from communities.
2. Criticism of Democratic Leadership
Minnesota Democratic officials (mayors, city council members, state leaders)
National Democratic figures (Chuck Schumer, Chris Van Hollen, Tina Smith, Stacey Abrams, Jon Ossoff)
Key accusations include:
Shielding criminal undocumented immigrants
Encouraging or excusing obstruction of ICE operations
Falsely portraying ICE as abusive or authoritarian
Refusing to condemn protests that allegedly crossed legal or ethical lines (e.g., disrupting church services)
3. Depiction of Internal Democratic Conflict
There is a “civil war” within the Democratic Party: One faction allegedly wants to abolish ICE outright
Another faction purportedly wants to soften rhetoric while effectively achieving the same outcome

Democrats are accused of strategically “humanizing criminals” and “dehumanizing ICE agents” to influence public perception.
4. Framing of Protests and Activism
Protesters opposing ICE are described as: “Far‑left,” “radical,” or “deranged”
Protecting criminals rather than communities

Protests at or inside churches are portrayed as violations of social and religious norms.
Democratic officials are criticized for characterizing these protests as mostly peaceful and justified.
5. Media and Narrative Control
Mainstream and local media underreport crimes committed by arrested undocumented immigrants
Media figures fail to challenge false or extreme claims made about ICE

ICE agents are framed as unfairly maligned while operating under hostile political conditions.
6. Broader Ideological Framing
The Democratic Party is portrayed as influenced by: Marxism, socialism, and communism
Anti‑police and anti‑law‑enforcement ideology

References to Hitler, Hugo Chávez, and authoritarianism are used to argue that left‑wing populism is dangerous and historically problematic.
7. Pro‑Trump and Law‑and‑Order Message
Donald Trump is: A defender of law enforcement
A counterweight to radical left activism

Voter support for Trump is driven by a desire for public safety, border enforcement, and accountability.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Central Claim of the Narrative
Over 10,000 “criminal illegal aliens” have been arrested in Minneapolis alone, with: 3,000 arrests in the past six weeks
70% tied to violent crimes

These arrests are attributed to DHS and ICE operations under the Trump administration.
2. Crimes Described
The arrests are said to include individuals accused of:
Murder
Rape
Child sexual offenses
Other violent felonies
This is the “worst of the worst” offenders and the arrests are a major public safety victory.
3. Accusations Against Minnesota Leadership:
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey
of the following:
Failing to protect public safety
Undermining federal immigration enforcement
Encouraging hostility toward ICE
Obstructing law enforcement through public statements
The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating both officials for allegedly impeding federal law enforcement, though it acknowledges:
The investigation is in early stages
No subpoenas or charges are confirmed
4. Allegations of Massive Financial Fraud
At least $19 billion in fraud tied to Minneapolis alone
Federal investigators are conducting large‑scale financial investigations
Some funds went to terrorist organizations (e.g., Al‑Shabab)
5. This Federal Case also includes:
Ties to the Feeding Our Future organization:
Is a real federal investigation in Minnesota
Involves approximately $250 million in alleged pandemic-era food program fraud
Has resulted in charges against 70 individuals (between 2022–2024)
6. Media Bias Argument
CBS and CNN are deliberately misleading the public
Journalists are accused of: Lying about arrest numbers
Downplaying criminal activity
Framing DOJ actions as “intimidation”

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Iran, U.S. Sanctions, and Regime Pressure
Iran’s leadership blames the United States for internal economic hardship, citing sanctions as “inhumane” and portraying opposition to the Supreme Leader as an act of war.
The commentary frames this messaging as state propaganda meant to deflect blame from Iran’s regime and suppress domestic protests.
The U.S., under President Trump, is described as escalating a “maximum pressure” sanctions campaign, with a specific focus on: Targeting Iran’s oil revenue and shadow shipping fleet
Sanctioning networks allegedly smuggling Iranian oil disguised as Iraqi exports
Tracking and freezing Iranian leadership’s assets, including money moved abroad

The piece claims sanctions are successfully weakening Iran’s economy, causing regime insiders to move money out of the country and increasing internal instability.
Overall framing: U.S. economic pressure is portrayed as effective, justified, and supportive of the Iranian people, while Iran’s leadership is depicted as collapsing and desperate.
2. Minnesota, ICE, and Domestic Political Conflict
The second half shifts to U.S. domestic politics, focusing on Minnesota state and Minneapolis city leadership.
Claims that the Department of Justice is investigating the Minnesota governor and Minneapolis mayor for: Obstruction of federal law enforcement
Misuse of taxpayer funds, with allegations that money ultimately reached foreign terrorist organizations

The commentary contrasts current DOJ investigations with past cases involving Democrats, arguing this is legitimate law enforcement, not political intimidation.
Strong criticism of Democratic officials for: Condemning or obstructing ICE operations
Using inflammatory language toward ICE agents
Supporting or encouraging the idea of abolishing or defunding ICE

Violent clashes involving ICE agents in Minneapolis are cited to argue that: Local leaders are enabling lawlessness
ICE arrests are targeting serious criminals, including violent offenders

Overall framing: Federal enforcement is restoring “law and order,” while Democratic officials are portrayed as reckless, radical, and hostile to public safety.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Role of Popular Uprising
Millions of Iranians are described as actively protesting against the ruling clerical regime.
The movement is portrayed as organic, domestic, and secular, not Islamist or anti‑Western.
Economic collapse is identified as the primary catalyst rather than a single political trigger.
Protesters are framed as the legitimate engine of change, with the U.S. positioned as a supporter rather than the instigator.
2. Economic Collapse as a Destabilizer
Hyperinflation and currency collapse (rial exceeding 1,000,000 to the dollar) have crippled daily life.
Bazaar closures, labor strikes (notably in energy), and widespread shortages are presented as systemic stressors.
Low global oil prices weaken Iran’s primary revenue source, limiting the regime’s ability to fund repression and foreign proxies.
3. U.S. Policy Contrast: Trump vs. Obama/Biden
There is a sharp contrast between: Obama/Biden: Characterized as conciliatory, passive, and supportive of engagement (e.g., Iran nuclear deal).
Trump: Portrayed as deterrence‑focused, confrontational, and openly supportive of regime change.

Trump’s public endorsement of a “new government” in Iran is framed as unprecedented and strategically consequential.
4. Deterrence Without Occupation
We reject a large‑scale military invasion.
Instead, we support: Targeted military strikes (e.g., nuclear facilities, IRGC leadership)
Covert operations
Clear deterrent threats against mass repression

The killing of Qasem Soleimani is highlighted as a key inflection point that shattered regime confidence.
5. Iran’s Strategic Weakness
Iran’s air defenses and regional influence are described as severely degraded.
Hezbollah, Hamas, and other proxies have been decapitated or weakened.
The regime is increasingly isolated as allies (Venezuela, Syria, Russia) face their own crises.
6. Internal Regime Fractures
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is portrayed as a potential kingmaker or coup actor.
The text suggests the IRGC: Controls vast economic assets
Is deeply unpopular with the public
May abandon the clerical leadership to preserve its own power

A coup becomes likely if U.S. pressure and labor strikes converge.
7. Information Control and Fear
Internet shutdowns and communication blackouts are signs of regime panic.
Supreme Leader Khamenei fears internal reform more than outright confrontation, drawing parallels to Soviet collapse.
9. Broader Geopolitical Context
Iran’s situation is linked to potential domino effects in Venezuela and Cuba.
Energy independence and low oil prices are framed as key U.S. national security tools.
The moment is compared to the fall of the Berlin Wall, suggesting a possible systemic collapse of authoritarian regimes without U.S. ground wars.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.