The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

1. Public Opinion on Illegal Immigration and Deportation
A recent poll reports shifting voter attitudes toward illegal immigration.
31% of registered voters say all illegal immigrants should be deported.
Overall views: 43% support allowing illegal immigrants to stay and eventually apply for citizenship.
40% favor deportation in general (with differing criteria).
7% support allowing them to stay without citizenship.

On who should be deported: 60% agree that illegal immigrants convicted of serious crimes should be deported.
19% support deportation for minor crimes.
Only 3% support deportation of: Long‑term, law‑abiding undocumented immigrants
Those brought to the U.S. as children


Party-line differences are significant: 57% of Republicans favor deporting all illegal immigrants.
This view is held by 24% of Independents and 7% of Democrats.
Strong bipartisan agreement exists on deporting those convicted of serious crimes.

Immigration enforcement is a major political issue heading into elections.
Department of Homeland Security statements highlight ICE arrests involving serious crimes, reinforcing public safety concerns raised by immigration critics.
2. Reported Disappearances and Deaths of U.S. Scientists
At least 10 cases are under review, involving personnel from: NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Other high‑level research institutions

The FBI is leading the investigation, coordinating with: Department of Energy
Department of Defense
Department of State
Local law enforcement

Cases span several years and include: Disappearances
Homicides
Unexplained deaths

A high‑profile case involves a retired Air Force Major General who disappeared under unusual circumstances.
Officials caution against conspiracy theories, noting: No confirmed links between the cases
Large scientific workforces statistically experience unrelated deaths

Some lawmakers speculate about possible foreign adversary involvement, though no evidence has confirmed this.
Federal agencies, including NASA, state there is no current indication of a national security threat.
The House Oversight Committee has launched its own inquiry amid public pressure for transparency.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Allegations of Qatar’s Influence Campaign in the U.S.
Qatar spends billions of dollars funding U.S. universities to influence American public opinion and academic culture.
Qatar hires Washington, D.C.–based PR and lobbying firms to “whitewash” its image, particularly regarding claims of support for extremist groups.
Qatar’s status is the largest foreign funder of U.S. universities, surpassing countries like China, and suggests this funding correlates with campus political activism.
Specific universities (e.g., Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Carnegie Mellon) are highlighted as major recipients of foreign funds.
Financial relationships will limit criticism of foreign governments, citing an example of a U.S. university campus in Qatar allegedly restricting speech about the Qatari regime.
2. Clarence Thomas’s Judicial Philosophy
Thomas is emphasizing: Judicial restraint and discipline
Originalism and adherence to the Constitution’s original meaning
The belief that rights come from God, not government, grounded in the Declaration of Independence

His personal background (raised by his grandfather, strict discipline, plainspoken style) is presented as shaping his judicial approach.
Thomas’s views with progressivism, which characterizes asserting that rights derive from government authority rather than natural or divine sources.
A Senate hearing anecdote is used to illustrate this ideological divide, portraying progressive views as mainstream within the modern Democratic Party.
3. Free Speech Conflicts on College Campuses
At UCLA Law School, protesters disrupted a talk by a Department of Homeland Security lawyer.
The disruption is a “heckler’s veto,” preventing speech rather than expressing dissent.
Similar past incidents at Stanford Law School are cited to argue that some law students’ conduct is incompatible with professional legal standards.
University administrations are failing to protect speech and enforce order during such events.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Federal Crackdown on Medicaid Fraud
CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz, working under President Donald Trump’s administration, has initiated a nationwide effort to combat Medicaid fraud, citing billions of dollars in losses due to noncompliant and fraudulent providers.

All 50 Governors Put on Notice
Every U.S. governor—regardless of party—has received identical letters requiring immediate action, signaling that Medicaid fraud is viewed as a national, not partisan, problem.

Strict Deadlines Imposed
10 business days: Governors must confirm whether they will conduct rapid revalidation of high‑risk Medicaid providers.
30 days: States must submit a broader Medicaid provider revalidation strategy.
Two‑year plan: States must outline long‑term methods for verifying provider legitimacy and compliance.

Focus on High‑Risk Providers CMS is prioritizing providers with:
Weak enrollment standards
Less rigorous billing oversight
Missing or invalid National Provider Identifiers (NPIs)
These providers are considered most vulnerable to fraud, waste, and abuse.

Escalated Federal Oversight Failure to comply with revalidation requirements will be used as a risk indicator of fraud and could affect future federal Medicaid funding decisions.

Law Enforcement Coordination States are instructed to work closely with law enforcement agencies, indicating that criminal investigations and prosecutions are expected to increase.

Catalyst: High‑Profile Fraud Cases Major scandals—especially in Minnesota and California—have intensified scrutiny:
Minnesota’s “Feeding Our Future” case (~$250M)
A state review estimating up to $1.7B in improper payments over four years These cases highlighted systemic vulnerabilities.

Potential Funding Deferrals CMS is considering Medicaid payment deferrals in states deemed noncompliant, setting the stage for legal and political conflicts between state and federal governments.

Policy Framed as Taxpayer Protection The initiative is presented as safeguarding resources for intended beneficiaries—low‑income individuals, seniors, children, and people with disabilities—by removing corrupt actors from the system.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center
The Southern Poverty Law Center: Was criminally indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Funded or financially supported extremist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazi organizations, and organizers of the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally.
Engaged in wire fraud, money laundering, and donor deception.

The SPLC is operating a fraudulent fundraising model, allegedly exaggerating or manufacturing extremism to increase donations.
The SPLC funding of extremists is: Intentional
Long‑term
Central to its fundraising success

Corporate donors (Apple, JPMorgan, MGM, etc.) are cited as unwitting enablers, accused of donating for “virtue signaling.”
2. Media and Institutional Complicity
Mainstream media ignored or covered up SPLC wrongdoing.
Corporate America gave millions without oversight.
Political and cultural elites protected SPLC due to ideological alignment.

Past warnings from commentators (e.g., John Stossel) are cited as evidence that concerns were longstanding.
3. Political Impact
The Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville is described as: Financially linked to SPLC funding, according to the show’s claims.
Used politically to attack conservatives and Donald Trump.

The SPLC allegedly used extremist events to drive massive fundraising growth, citing revenue increases after major controversies.
4. Free Speech and Campus Controversies
A UCLA Law School event where progressive students allegedly disrupted and silenced a conservative speaker from the Department of Homeland Security.

The behavior is a “heckler’s veto”, framed as: Antithetical to free speech
A sign of ideological intolerance on the left

Comparisons are made to similar incidents at Stanford Law School.
Law students are criticized as being unfit for the legal profession if they engage in such conduct.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Large-Scale Spending Allegation
Claims California spent approximately $1 billion to bring or support 400,000 undocumented immigrants.
Attributes these figures to a report allegedly from the Manhattan Institute.

Use of Public Funds
Asserts state and federal tax dollars were directed to nonprofit organizations (e.g., Catholic Charities, Jewish Family Services, immigrant legal groups).
Frames this funding as political kickbacks rather than humanitarian or service-based grants.

Political Organizing Accusations
Claims immigrant-advocacy organizations function as political machines: Organizing protests
Producing political messaging
Monitoring ICE activities

Alleges coordination with Democratic political goals.

Social and Economic Impact Narrative
Argues mass immigration: Depresses wages
Increases housing costs
Strains public services
Drives longtime residents out of California

Uses anecdotal housing examples to emphasize overcrowding and rent inflation.

Historical and Ideological Framing
Compares modern Democratic immigration policies to 19th-century political machines (e.g., Tammany Hall).
Frames migrants as: Economic tools
Long-term welfare recipients
Future Democratic voters

Uses language suggesting exploitation and dependency.

Criticism of Sanctuary Policies
Strongly opposes sanctuary city laws.
Frames limits on immigration enforcement as: Encouraging illegality
Undermining public safety
Blocking federal authority


Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.