The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

In this episode of the Ben Ferguson show podcast, Ben examines allegations surrounding the reported “Round River” intelligence operation, discuss claims of politically divided disinformation classifications, review questions raised about FBI and intelligence community activities, and analyze a closely watched Wisconsin Democratic primary that Ferguson argues offers lessons about polling, turnout, and the growing influence of the Democratic Socialist movement.
A newly publicized report about an alleged FBI and intelligence community operation known as “Round River” has sparked questions about how public figures were categorized during investigations tied to Russian disinformation and the Biden family Ukraine controversy. Ben Ferguson examines reporting that claims government agencies maintained lists that labeled some political figures and media organizations as either “targets” or “conduits” of disinformation. He discusses the release of documents by the White House Government Transparency Task Force, questions surrounding the Foreign Influence Task Force, and statements attributed to FBI Director Kash Patel regarding ongoing reviews and investigations. The episode also shifts to Wisconsin, where a Democratic gubernatorial primary produced an unexpected result. Ferguson analyzes the defeat of a Democratic Socialist candidate who had been viewed by many as the frontrunner and explores what the outcome could mean for Democrats, Republicans, and voter turnout in one of the nation’s most important battleground states.
Topics Covered:
Allegations surrounding the reported “Round River” counterintelligence operation
Claims that public figures were categorized as “targets” or “conduits” of disinformation
Questions about the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force and internal reviews
Document releases by the White House Government Transparency Task Force
Wisconsin’s Democratic gubernatorial primary and the defeat of a Democratic Socialist candidate
The role of polling, voter turnout, and battleground state politics ahead of future elections
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss challenges to current gender policies in women's sports, reactions to recent WNBA-related controversies, comments from public figures on athletics and gender identity, and the broader political implications surrounding these debates. They also examine remarks from Democratic candidates and progressive political figures on masculinity, football, religion, and cultural issues as campaigns for future elections begin to take shape.
The WNBA's policies on gender eligibility are facing new scrutiny after former NBA players announced plans to declare for future WNBA draft eligibility. The debate has reignited broader questions about fairness in women's sports, competitive balance, and how athletic organizations define eligibility standards.At the center of the discussion are public challenges involving professional women's basketball, reactions from athletes and commentators, and growing pressure on sports leagues to clarify their policies. The conversation also expands into larger cultural and political debates about gender, athletics, and public discourse.
Topics Covered:
Former NBA players Enes Freedom Kanter and Royce White announcing plans to pursue WNBA eligibility
Debate over gender eligibility standards in women's professional sports
Clay Travis's public challenge involving the WNBA and high school basketball teams
Criticism of progressive views on masculinity and football from Democratic candidates
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's positioning ahead of potential future national campaigns
Religion, education, and faith-related comments by Democratic Senate candidates
The Bottom Line: Senator Ted Cruz argues that current gender-identity policies in sports create conflicts that leagues will eventually be forced to address directly. He and Ben Ferguson also contend that several Democratic candidates are moderating or obscuring past positions as they seek broader electoral support
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss James O’Keefe’s undercover reporting in Minnesota, the state’s voter-vouching rules, ongoing debates over voter identification requirements, Cruz’s support for election-integrity legislation, and the broader political arguments surrounding election security and voter confidence.
A James O’Keefe undercover investigation in Minnesota reignites debate over voter verification, election integrity, and whether existing voting laws leave the system vulnerable to abuse. Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine footage from an undercover operation that tests Minnesota’s voter “vouching” system, a process that allows registered voters to verify the identity and residency of certain unregistered voters. The discussion focuses on concerns about election security, voter fraud, and the broader political implications of ballot access policies. The episode also expands beyond a single incident to consider a larger question: how candidates associated with the Democratic Socialists of America and other progressive movements continue to gain political traction. Cruz argues that deception and voter fraud are major factors in modern political campaigns, while Ferguson asks how voters should evaluate those claims and the systems surrounding election administration.
Topics Covered:
James O’Keefe’s undercover investigation in Minnesota
Minnesota’s voter-vouching system and election procedures
Debate over voter ID requirements and election security
Claims regarding voter fraud and election integrity
Cruz’s support for the SAVE America Act
Political implications for Democratic Socialists of America and progressive candidates
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz explains his decision to delete a prior episode after learning that an 82% miscarriage statistic tied to COVID vaccination claims was inaccurate. Ted and Ben discuss the underlying study, the subsequent correction, and their view that public officials should be held accountable for contradictory public and private statements. The discussion then turns to election integrity, voter registration policies in Minnesota, and a series of Democratic candidates running in Senate races across the country. The hosts examine positions on immigration, gender-related healthcare policies, abortion, religion, and campaign strategy, arguing that these races reveal significant ideological divisions heading into the election season.
A correction to a widely discussed COVID vaccine statistic leads Ted Cruz to explain why a previous episode was removed and outlines the data issues behind a claim about miscarriage rates following vaccination during pregnancy. He argues that accuracy matters and walks listeners through the study, the criticism it received, and why the specific figure cited could not be supported.The conversation then shifts to the 2026 election landscape, with a focus on several Democratic Senate candidates and the policy positions that Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson describe as part of a broader ideological shift within the Democratic Party.
Topics Covered:
Correction and removal of a previous episode citing an inaccurate COVID vaccine miscarriage statistic
Debate over public and private statements from Anthony Fauci regarding pregnancy-related vaccine concerns
Minnesota voter registration and voter-vouching policies discussed through undercover reporting by James O'Keefe
Senate candidate debates involving immigration, healthcare, and gender-related medical policies
Arguments surrounding late-term abortion legislation and public opinion on abortion policy
Religion, faith, and political messaging in several high-profile Senate campaigns
The Bottom Line: According to Ted Cruz, correcting factual errors is essential to maintaining credibility, even when the broader argument remains unchanged. He and Ben Ferguson also contend that several Democratic Senate candidates represent a significantly more progressive ideological direction ahead of the upcoming elections.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine the allegations surrounding the reported “Round River” assessment, the FBI’s review of related activities, and broader concerns about transparency, accountability, and political bias within government institutions. They also shift to escalating tensions with Iran, discussing statements from a senior adviser to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps suggesting Tehran could seek to prolong its confrontation with the United States in an effort to outlast President Donald Trump. The conversation explores U.S. pressure tactics against Iran, claims about economic strain on the regime, and reports of ongoing threats against the president.
A newly disclosed report about an alleged FBI and intelligence operation called “Round River” is raising questions about how public figures were categorized during investigations tied to Russian disinformation and the Biden family Ukraine scandal. According to the report discussed in this episode, prominent Republicans and conservative organizations were allegedly labeled as “conduits” of disinformation, while leading Democrats were categorized as “targets.” The controversy centers on a spreadsheet reportedly recovered from U.S. intelligence files and released by the White House Government Transparency Task Force. The document has sparked debate over whether political affiliation influenced how individuals and organizations were treated by federal agencies.
Topics Covered:
The reported FBI and intelligence assessment known as “Round River”
Allegations that public figures were categorized as “conduits” or “targets” of disinformation
The White House Government Transparency Task Force document release
FBI reviews involving the Foreign Influence Task Force
Iran’s reported strategy to prolong confrontation with the United States
President Trump’s pressure campaign, sanctions, and blockade strategy against Iran
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.