Courtroom Confidential

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial has ended in a mistrial after seven days of deliberations and more than 36 hours without a unanimous verdict.

Clancy’s defense says 11 jurors were prepared to acquit her, while one holdout juror prevented the panel from reaching a verdict. After the judge declined to remove that juror and the jury reported that it remained deadlocked, a mistrial was declared.

What caused the impasse? Did the holdout juror properly apply the law, and will the Commonwealth put Lindsay Clancy through a second trial?

Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter breaks down the dramatic conclusion, the fight over the lone holdout and what could happen next.

About Joshua Ritter:
Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true crime cases.

Follow Josh:
https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ
https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/
https://www.joshuaritter.com/
https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

Follow Courtroom Confidential:
https://x.com/CRConfidential
https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/
https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en

Merch:
https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

Support our moderators:
https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential

DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancyMIstrial #LindsayClancyVerdict
Support the show

Verdict watch in the Lindsay Clancy trial has entered a sixth day after more than 30 hours of deliberations and two previous reports that the jury could not reach a unanimous decision. Can they finally reach an agreement, or is the trial headed toward a mistrial?

Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter breaks down what the jury is struggling to decide and whether a mistrial is becoming more likely. Join us LIVE for the latest developments, legal analysis and your questions.

00:00 Welcome
01:07 Where things stand
02:40 Signs that point to a potential verdict
03:57 Can judge give a second Tuey-Rodriguez instruction?
07:13 If there's a mistrial, will the same Commonwealth attorneys try the case?
07:38 Is it coercion to deliberate until others change their mind?
08:15 Is there a required amount of time after Tuey-Rodriguez is given?
12:20 Why is the jury's silence surprising?
14:00 Will the judge ask if there's anything they're unanimous on?

About Joshua Ritter:
Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases.
Follow Josh:
https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ
https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/
https://www.joshuaritter.com/
https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

Follow Courtroom Confidential:
https://x.com/CRConfidential
https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/
https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en

Merch:
https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

Support our moderators:
https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential

DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
Support the show

The Lindsay Clancy jury remains in deliberations after reporting that it could not reach a unanimous verdict. Then a woman was arrested outside Plymouth Superior Court after allegedly filming jurors, leading to a warning from the judge and individual questioning of every juror.

Reporting from outside the courthouse, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter explains why the jury’s silence may suggest movement, what happens if jurors again say they cannot agree, and when Massachusetts’ Tuey-Rodriguez instruction could lead to a verdict or mistrial.

Later, Josh breaks down the decision ordering Tyler Robinson to stand trial for the killing of Charlie Kirk and why the death penalty remains on the table.

0:00 Live outside Plymouth Superior Court
2:22 Lindsay Clancy verdict watch
2:28 Why jurors requested the knife and pill bottles
3:15 Jury reports it cannot reach a verdict
5:08 Judge issues a warning
6:04 Woman arrested after allegedly filming jurors
8:33 Every juror questioned individually
10:35 Why the jury’s silence may signal movement
14:03 What a “dynamite charge” means
16:50 Tyler Robinson ordered to stand trial
21:24 Final updates and show schedule

About Joshua Ritter:
Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases.

Follow Josh:
https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ
https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/
https://www.joshuaritter.com/
https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

Follow Courtroom Confidential:
https://x.com/CRConfidential
https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/
https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en

Merch:
https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

Support our moderators:
https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential

DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancyVerdictWatch #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk
Support the show

The jury returns Monday to continue deliberations in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial after two days without a verdict. NewsNation senior correspondent Laura Ingle joins former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney Joshua Ritter to discuss what happened inside the courtroom, what jurors may be weighing and whether their requests to examine the knife and prescription bottles offer any clues about where deliberations are headed.

Plus, Josh breaks down Bryan Kohberger’s latest attempt to undo his guilty plea, including new motions seeking to disqualify the judge and move his post-conviction proceedings back to Latah County.

Follow Laura Ingle!
https://www.youtube.com/@CrimeFilesLauraIngle
https://x.com/lauraingle
https://www.instagram.com/lauraingletv?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

About Joshua Ritter:
Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true crime cases.

Follow Josh:
https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ
https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/
https://www.joshuaritter.com/
https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

Follow Courtroom Confidential:
https://x.com/CRConfidential
https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/
https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en

Merch:
https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

Support our moderators:
https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential

DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
Support the show

True crime, legal analysis, and YOUR questions—LIVE! Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter answers viewer questions on the biggest cases in true crime, including Lindsay Clancy, Shanna Gardner, Karmelo Anthony, Laken Snelling, Keffe D and more. 

Summer Merch Collection: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/collections/summer-collection

Want to ask Josh your true crime legal question for next Sunday Funday? Get your questions in before 11:59pm PT Friday! Click the tab on the right side here: https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

Sunday Funday Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLiteA2x_mfo3H6cFS91S0tBu600tjCeFJ&si=Afeir78gpaWnjK8K

Courtroom Confidential: Live Trials: https://www.youtube.com/@CCLiveTrials

Become a CC Crew member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQVmA_wratr69AQdmWtRLAw/join

Give us a follow:
https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/
https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ
https://www.tiktok.com/@joshuaritteresq
https://www.joshuaritter.com/
https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/

DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

#lindsayclancy #patrickclancy #lindsayclancytrial #shannagardner #keefed #duanedavis #tupacmurder #tupac #deathpenalty  #truecrime #truecrimecommunity #truecrimepodcast #legalanalysis #criminaldefense #livetrial #courtroomconfidential #evidence #selfdefense #juryselection #murder #manslaughter #lakensnelling
Support the show