Powered by RND
PodcastsScienceDr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls.
Listen to Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls. in the App
Listen to Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls. in the App
(36,319)(250,152)
Save favorites
Alarm
Sleep timer

Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls.

Podcast Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls.
Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls
Relevant, evidence based, and practical information for medical students, residents, and practicing healthcare providers regarding all things women’s healthcare...

Available Episodes

5 of 921
  • BRAND NEW USPSTF Recs (12/10/24) on HPV Screening
    EVERYTHING CHANGES! So true. And now, the USPSTF has changed (UPDATED) their recommendations for cervical cancer screening in regards to HPV primary screening. This is BRAND NEW, within the last 24 hours. Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer has gained a lot of steam and is progressing quickly. The FDA approval of “dual stain” testing of hrHPV positive results, the recent FDA approval for patient self-collection for HPV vaginal samples in a clinical setting, and now this new draft recommendation from the USPSTF. What did they update? How is that controversial? Listen in for details!
    --------  
    32:34
  • Episode: OB Sono “Issues”: 2 for 2.
    Well, in this episode we have 2 very interesting and challenging clinical situations. These come from real world clinical encounters so we thought we would share these with you because they are brain teasers and should be discussed. They both have to do with OB ultrasound. First, is there a “minimal” CRL to estimate gestational age? In other words, is there a CRL that is too small to be accurate? It’s an intriguing question and we will give an answer! Second, in women with regular and predictable menstrual cycles that are every 21 or 35 days, how to we “reconcile” a CRL EGA since that CRL algorithm is based on a “typical 4-week cycle”? How can we? Should we adjust the sono dating? WE will review in this episode. PLUS, we will review the latest data on how AI can greatly impact gestational age calculation via ultrasound. So, we have 2 questions, and we will give 2 answers (2 x2)…Listen in for details.
    --------  
    48:06
  • NEW DATA: Acetaminophen in OB=ADHD & ASD! (Not So Much.)
    Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) is a common over-the-counter medication that has gained substantial media attention regarding its use by pregnant women. Although estimates vary considerably, most studies and surveys report that around 40–65% of women take acetaminophen sometime during their pregnancy. Historically considered safe, concern was initially raised back in 2014 with a JAMA Pediatrics publication stated that use in pregnancy lead to ADHD in the offspring. Seven years later, in 2021, a consensus statement published in Nature Reviews Endocrinology suggested that acetaminophen use in pregnancy might increase the risk of neurodevelopmental and urogenital tract abnormalities in offspring and called for “precautionary action”. This lead tgo an ACOG response back in Sep 29, 2021 (we will review). This is very controversial. Today, Dec 5, 2024, a new clinical perspective was published in Obstetrics & Gynecology adding another flavor to the mix. Is acetaminophen a direct cause of fetal harm? Listen in for details!
    --------  
    27:08
  • Another Nail in the 81mg ASA Coffin? Move to 162mg?
    In November 2013, ACOG issued the Hypertension in Pregnancy Task Force Report recommending daily low-dose aspirin (81mg) beginning in the late 1st trimester for women with a history of early-onset preeclampsia and preterm delivery at less than 34 0/7 weeks, or for women with more than one prior pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. The following year, the USPSTF published a similar guideline, although the list of indications for low-dose aspirin use was more expansive. Since then, the ACOG has issued new guidance on low-dose aspirin, in 2018 and 2021. Nonetheless, while criteria for use has evolved, the dosage recommended has remained as 81 mg. But MEDICINE MOVES FAST, and a new Expert Review in the AJOG MFM is making a case for 162mg. Are we underdosing low-dose aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia? A litany of data says YES. Listen in for details.
    --------  
    35:16
  • The Fertility Anxiety Panic: Freeze Eggs in 20s?
    The first successful births from frozen eggs were twins, born in Australia in 1986. IVF serves a valuable role for those with persistent infertility issues or other conditions where natural conception is hindered. Although oocyte cryopreservation was initially used as a fertility preservation strategy for medical indications, currently, it is increasingly used to circumvent age-related infertility. This process of elective egg retrieval and cryopreservation- targeting women in their 20s- has gotten out of hand! Mainly due to social media, Gen Z women are panicking about their fertility. Should They Be? For decades, the age of 35 has been seen as a “demarcation line” for female fertility. Before 35, the theory often goes, most women will have little trouble conceiving, but at that point, fertility falls off a cliff. This misunderstanding of natural fertility processes, spurred on by false information on social media, has led to 20-somethings calling for egg retrieval and egg freezing. The dread of age 35 is so pervasive that its effect bleeds backward in time, with women in their early 30s—and yes, sometimes even in their late 20s—already feeling as if they are behind in the race against their “biological clock.” But the reality of fertility “loss” is much more complicated then just “falling off a cliff” and should be viewed more as of a natural “slope” rather than a “cliff”. About a decade after it shed its “experimental” label from the ASRM, oocyte retrieval and cyropreservation has become ubiquitous in our social media culture and has ballooned in popularity, with over a million frozen eggs or embryos stored in the United States today. It has done little, however, to materially change women’s lives. The ASRM has an ETHICS COMMITTEE OPINION (2024) on this very thing. Is 35 really a fertility cliff? Or it it 32? Is egg freezing in late or early 30s the best way to go for delayed fertility? Listen in for details as we set the record straight.
    --------  
    37:39

More Science podcasts

About Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls.

Relevant, evidence based, and practical information for medical students, residents, and practicing healthcare providers regarding all things women’s healthcare! This podcast is intended to be clinically relevant, engaging, and FUN, because medical education should NOT be boring! Welcome...to Clinical Pearls.
Podcast website

Listen to Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls., These Woods Are Haunted and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features
Social
v7.0.0 | © 2007-2024 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 12/13/2024 - 9:45:21 PM